We can’t trust folks from the cities to protect our rural communities. We need our own voice in Sacramento. Because if we don’t manage our forests, Mother Nature will do it for us.

After decades of trying to “protect” our forests, Sacramento and Washington have only succeeded in stockpiling fuel for horrifyingly large fires. How many already endangered species are sucked into the inferno every year?  How much greenhouse gas is dumped into the atmosphere when 1.5 million acres goes up in smoke? How many timber industry households are now threatened by the forests that used to put food on their tables?

It’s time to stop paying for feel-good policies with human lives.

Somewhere along the line, special interests redefined the word “conservation” to mean “look but don’t touch.” By definition, that sets up California forests for recurring massive wildfires, which plagued the land long before even the first humans arrived.

I believe in productive conservation, which has three basic principles that come from real conservative values:

Principle 1: Natural resources create wealth.

During the Gold Rush, people from all over America came to California, because they thought they could make a better living for themselves by harvesting a natural resource. Gold doesn’t grow back, but timber does — it’s California’s most prolific renewable resource. Properly-managed forests support industry, which supports community. Timber is not just a means to build a roof over your head, but a means to keep it over your head, too, as a renewable crop that can be managed for harvest and renewal.

Cutting regulation on the timber industry means more jobs and fewer catastrophic wildfires.

Principle 2: Waste is immoral.

Preventing waste is a basic principle of good business, but when it comes to our natural resources, preventing large-scale waste is a moral issue. Hunters and fishermen speak of their contempt for wanton waste, the taking of a wild game animal and needlessly wasting its edible or useful parts. In California, I can think of no more wanton waste than a wildfire: timber, which could have sheltered wildlife and sustained a community, instead is squandered to fuel their destruction.

Wasting our resources, by wildfire or mismanagement, is an unethical treatment of nature.

Principle 3: We must work for the benefit of our children.

The public lands of the United States belong to all of us. We elect governments to steward our public resources not only for our benefit today, but for our childrens’ benefit tomorrow. Responsible forestry is about keeping a timber crop alive and healthy for generations to come, not leaving our children to the uncertainties and lethal risks of ideological hands-off policies.

Forestry policy should provide the most benefit, to the largest number of people, for the longest time.

With principled, conservative policies, we can prevent catastrophic wildfires and put rural California back to work. This won’t be easy, nothing worthwhile is.

  1. Bert Byers says:

    I’m wondering where you came up with the idea that “ massive wildfires plagued the land even before the first humans arrived”? As a retired forester( aa forestry Feather River College, BS forestry U of Montana), timber faller/ fire captain ( Cal Fire), we learned from fire scars on old trees/ stumps, ( prior to white mans arrival) that low intensity ground fires occurred in the Sierras on the average of every 7 years. Yes some of these were intentionally set by native Americans but, the majority were lightning caused. Once again they were low intensity because they burned often enough that fuel buildups were not like we have today. So my question back to you can you explain your quote at the beginning of my reply, please.
    I hope you can be a new voice for conservative politics ( because this state is swirling down the drain), but make sure you can present your arguments logically. Thanks have a great day! And good luck!

  2. Elizabeth Gnile says:

    As I was reading this, I was hearing the conversation I just had with someone. I am so glad to hear people in the public arena saying these things.

  3. Danielle says:

    I’m a Ca Registered Professonial Forester and your ideas are on point. We know how to manage for fuels but are hindered from doing so. Thank you fir this!

  4. LeAnne Wood says:

    Thank goodness for a voice of common sense in the political arena. Having lived near Redding, California for 38 years and seeing the devastation of several wild fires and the financial devastation to so many families in the destruction of the timber industry in the northern California area, we surely need someone who understands the way to manage our forests and preserves this beautiful part of the country from the dangers of fires. It is obvious that the lumber industry is still needed, because even those people who are part of the Sierra Club and other environmental organizations most likely live in homes that are built with lumber, use paper products in their daily lives, and since the wide use of plastic has become such an environmental disaster it makes more sense to use wood products (paper bags for groceries) that can be composted and will deteriorate in a quick manner.

  5. Mary Lou says:

    There is a great publication that Chico State put out in the fall of last year, ironically just before the Paradise fire, headlined The Rise of Megafires. Has some great articles including one on making public lands more accessible to Farmers for grazing the way they used to years ago. It goes hand in hand with timber harvesting, and benefits everyone.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes:

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>